HP has filed at the UK's Companies House the results of an audit of the 2010 financial results of two of Autonomy's eight divisions, which says that the UK software firm's revenues were actually just 54 per cent of its initially stated figure, and that their profit figure for the year needs to be cut by a whopping 81 per cent.
"These restatements, and the reasons for them, are consistent with HP's previous disclosures regarding accounting improprieties in Autonomy's pre-acquisition financials," an HP spokesman told The Daily Telegraph in a statement.
More ReadingHP rides data center growth out of sludgy IT marketHP 'KNEW' about Autonomy's hardware sales BEFORE the whistle blew: reportHP wants HUNDREDS of hapless staffers OUT by April - trade unionHP to hire 400 people in Oz 'innovation centre'HP clinches six week extension on whether to join shareholders' suit against Autonomy
"The substantial work necessary to prepare these accounts has revealed extensive accounting errors and misrepresentations in the previously issued 2010 audited financial statements, including the problems previously identified by HP."
Autonomy reported profits of £105.7m for fiscal year 2010, but according to HP's beancounters the process for divining that figure was flawed by "transfer pricing revenue," and accounting policy changes. The real profit was just £19.6mm, they said, and revenues should be £81.3m, not the original figure of £175.6m.
According to the filing, HP claims that Autonomy reported sales where "collectability issues existed," (i.e., from firms that couldn't pay) and from "barter-type transactions." HP also suggests that Autonomy didn't take into account the costs of customizing software for specific deals, and overvalued service contracts.
HP's filing also warned that the company was still going through Autonomy's books, and there may be more adjustments to the software house's figures in the future.
However, Autonomy's former management have hit back strongly, saying HP is using its own dodgy accounting practices to reduce its liabilities and to try to game a tax rebate from the UK tax authorities.
"We continue to reject these allegations by HP," the management team said in a statement. "Given the size of HP's writedown, we are very surprised by the small size of these adjustments in Autonomy Systems Limited attributed to the ongoing accounting dispute, which represent a few per cent of group revenue.
"Other causes of the change including explicitly stated changes in accounting policy. We note that a majority of the change in numbers is due to transfer pricing between jurisdictions, a mechanism which often reduces a company's tax bill in the UK. We hope the UK government will take a robust position in rebuffing HP's attempts to deprive it of over £38m in tax revenue."
HP has put in a tax refund request to the UK's notoriously tight-fisted Inland Revenue, but is still waiting on a response. Regulators in the UK and US have launched investigations into the affair, but these could take years to sort out.
In the meantime, HP is still dealing with the fallout from the $8.8bn write-down it made after buying Autonomy for $10.24bn back in 2011, when HP was headed up by former CEO Léo Apotheker. A shareholder lawsuit is ongoing, and current CEO Meg Whitman is in the hot seat for allegedly ignoring warning signs about the deal. ®