The Channel logo


By | Paul Kunert 26th March 2013 15:54

'End the commercial-in-confidence CROOKS' CHARTER', gov told

Rip the cloak off the ripoff deals, advise Cabinet Office

Secrecy in public sector contracts must be removed if government is to ever put an end to freeloading by suppliers at the taxpayers' expense, parliamentarians have been told.

A Public Administration Committee probe into government procurement heard this suggestion yesterday, as the top bods within the Cabinet Office were quizzed on efforts to reform purchasing.

Bill Crothers, Cabinet Office chief procurement officer told the PAC chaired by Bernard Jenkin, Conservative MP for Essex North, that "tension" remains between various departments.

"The truth is there has been a habit, a culture, an established norm, practice, call it what you will, across the system where departments have primacy and are used to having the total relationship with the supplier," he said.

In the last two months, government CIO Liam Maxwell was blocked by lawyers working inside a department from accessing confidential data on a bid, the PAC was told by Crothers.

"So there are still residual issues," said Stephen Kelly, COO, "which prevent us quickly moving on data and a consolidated one Crown relationship with industry."

Transparency has vastly improved under the new government, the Cabinet officers claimed, as until January 2011 they had no data on suppliers or the spend in each department.

The Cabinet Office claims it saved taxpayers £702m on tech and comms spending in fiscal 2012 but the National Audit Office said it was unable to verify £348m of this.


"Weakness in data".

Jenkin asked what would be the impact if he recommended in his report that government should abandon its current practice of "hiding the true margin that commercial suppliers are making," specifically by "saying we are going to publish all the financial information?"

Crothers said:

"Perfect competition requires perfect information. In theory this moves toward perfect information; it would help competition."

"Improvements we've made are [intended to] stop those practices. We've taken money out. However it is a continual battle, I don't think suppliers have got there yet," he said.

Arguably neither has government, which has already mandated that all contracts should be published on Contracts Finder to little effect.

Sally Collier, Cabinet Office deputy chief procurement officer, said invariably "some of that commercial in confidence information is redacted on those grounds of commercial-in-confidence."

So as it stands, some people in some departments continue to use secrecy to cloak inflated prices paid to suppliers with influential unseen access to the process, instead of safeguarding the public purse - a point not lost on Crothers and Co.

And this practice can often mean very large amounts of money indeed: it is not limited just to IT buys. ®

comment icon Read 14 comments on this article alert Send corrections


Privacy image

Frank Jennings

Two working parties, ministers galore... but data transfer law remains in limbo

Chris Evans

It does simplify the hardware setup, whatever it is
A microscopic view of the biometric shark skin. Pic: James Weaver

Chris Mellor

Do something and stop faffing about in the bush league

Kat Hall

International system in general needs greater transparency


Nerd fail photo via Shutterstock
Shouting match
Single market vs. rest of the world
Mostly it's financial crime. Here's what all the cool kids' terms mean in English
Apple logo. Pic: Blake Patterson
Plenty of bumps in the 40-year road for Mac makers