Original URL: http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/13/ooxml_software_freedom_lawyers/
The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) has warned that promises made by Microsoft over its Office Open XML (OOXML) document formats could leave open source software developers at risk of legal action.
The SFLC found a number of shortcomings in Microsoft’s Open Specification Promise (OSP) (http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx).
The OSP document was first written by the software giant in 2006 to put a lid on developers' concerns that they could violate patents that relate to OOXML, the file format Microsoft is currently pushing to get approved with the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO).
But the SFLC said that the OSP lacks watertight promise for developers (http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/osp-gpl.html) and said: "the OSP provides no assurance to GPL developers and that it is unsafe to rely upon the OSP for any free software implementation, whether under the GPL(General Public License) or another free software license.".
The OSP small print reveals limits to Microsoft’s specifications with patent protections that only apply to current versions, but provides no provision for future versions, which weakens the firm’s claim that its promise was "irrevocable", said the SFLC.
The team also cautioned that software developers who write Microsoft-derived code could be limited in how that code, such as the OOXML specification, is used.
“The OSP doesn’t permit free software implementation: it permits implementation under free software licenses so long as the resulting code isn’t used freely,” said the SFLC.
Unsurprisingly, the team recommends against OOXML being adopted by the ISO as an international standard.
Meanwhile, ISO members from 33 countries have until 29 March to change their minds and give Microsoft's OOXML their blessing.
Last autumn the majority voted no to adopting it as an international standard file format. ®
BSI faces High Court challenge over OOXML U-turn (1 May 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/05/01/bsi_ooxml_vote_high_court/
Office 2007 fails OXML test (22 April 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/22/office_2007_oxml_fails_test/
A week in the life of Open XML (11 April 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/11/ooxml_protests_resolutions_ec/
Microsoft discloses 14,000 pages of coding secrets (8 April 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/08/microsoft_posts_protocol_documents/
Fresh blood - the new fight for open source (8 April 2008)
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/04/08/open_source_user_participation/
EC probes OOXML standards-setting process (4 April 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/04/ooxml_ec_investigation_iso/
Official: OOXML approved as international standard (2 April 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/02/ooxml_iso_approved/
ISO puts OOXML announcement on ice (1 April 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/01/ooxml_iso_announcement_delayed/
OOXML approved as international standard? (31 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/31/iso_ooxml_votes_approve/
Microsoft makes final heroic grab for OOXML votes (28 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/28/ooxml_iso_osp/
Royalties are the admission price, Microsoft tells freetards (27 March 2008)
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/03/27/microsoft_brad_smith_patents_royalties/
UK to fly the flag for OOXML (26 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/26/bsi_vote_yes_ooxml/
Cuba, India vote no on OOXML (25 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/25/ooxml_votes_india_cuba/
AJAX patent threat to giants under the hammer (25 March 2008)
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/03/25/ajax_patent_auction/
Patent Office loses software not a patent case (19 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/19/patents_software_online/
US gives thumbs up to OOXML for ISO standard (10 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/10/us_delegation_approve_ooxml/
Microsoft partners cosy up on interoperability (7 March 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/03/07/microsoft_interoperability_ooxml/
Google takes a swipe at OOXML (27 February 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/02/27/google_ooxml_blog_post/
EU investigates Microsoft's OOXML campaign (8 February 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/02/08/ooxml_eu_probe_iso/
Microsoft puts dusty, old Office code on web (18 January 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/01/18/microsoft_office_binary_code/
OOXML marks the spot, says research firm (16 January 2008)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/01/16/microsoft_burton_odf_xml/
ODF vs OOXML - views from the coal face (11 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/11/odf_vs_ooml_poll/
OOXML vs ODF: where next for interoperability? (25 October 2007)
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/10/25/ooxml_vs_odf/
Google gloats over ISO's OOXML rejection (17 September 2007)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/09/17/google_iso_gloat/
Microsoft spins standards defeat into victory (5 September 2007)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/09/05/microsoft_ooxml_defeat/
SIS nixes OOXML approval (31 August 2007)
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/08/31/ooxml_nixed/
Microsoft accused of ballot stuffing in standards vote (29 August 2007)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/08/29/microsoft_ooxml_sweeden_rigged_vote/
© Copyright 2008