Channel Register

Comments on: Intel single-core 'Silverthorne' to sport HyperThreading

This is the same core... 

Posted Monday 4th February 2008 09:06 GMT

that will be used in intel's new multicore cpu and it's based on the classic pentium design. (the one before pentium pro) They plan to use this cpu as a building block for the new generation of intel based videocards too, in groups of 8,16,32,etc. 64 of such cores with 2 threads per core (=128 threads) would only mean 128Watts of power, about as much as a current day 8 core, 128 threads nvidia gf8800 card eats.

@auser 

Posted Monday 4th February 2008 14:28 GMT

Boffin

I'm struggling to see how they'll use this as the "building block" for a videocard. The reference design here is a general purpose processing unit that would be rather ineffective at doing graphics. GPUs are special purpose and a lot less flexible, generally speaking they're Simple Instruction, Multiple Data processors. While a CPU could do the job of a GPU, it wouldn't do it as efficiently. Similarly a GPU wouldn't have the flexibility to do the work of a CPU.

wow, Déjà vu 

Posted Tuesday 5th February 2008 04:25 GMT

I have a 2Ghz P4, that doesn't have HT. And yet, It feels like some kind of weird time warp. Why should anyone be excited about HT tech? Really. It was a bad idea when it first came out, its a bad idea now.

Don’t Miss

Emails show journalist rigged Wikipedia's naked shorts

Overstock's Byrne vindicated amidst economic meltdown

AppleApple ups the ante in Psystar battle

Attack on the Cloners

DollarCredit crunch hitting IT mergers

Deals drying up as advisers disappear

thumbs up teaser 75PC market defies credit crunch

HP bests Dell once again