Top Stories
|
Chinese tech firm flirts with Seagate28 Aug 2007 11:54 Could Lenovo be muscling in on US-dominated HDD industry?So what...By Eduard Coli
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 13:28 GMT
Any technology already made in the PRC has to be considered available to the PRC. It is an unwritten rule that if you move your production to the PRC and the govenrment and especially the military wants access to some patent or design and you refuse you will have problems with worker strikes and most likely will get thrown out and your assets nationalized. Even above board you can't get away from it as many companies in the PRC require a government board member. Then there is outright IP theft. There was an example of a German machine tool company that had a lathe produced by a contractor in the PRC only to find a duplicate of their design at a trade show produced by the same company contracted by them. Morale of the story, Any company that moves production to the workers paradise that is the PRC is creating their own competition. No company or government can expect proper treatment of sensitive data by any company that has production in the PRC. Like for likeBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 13:52 GMT
How delightful that the US gubmint is so concerned about others (in this case China) being able to do to it, what it routinely does to every other country on the planet (plant backdoors in code allowing their own spooks in). Enjoy a bit of your own medicine there Uncle Sam and learn what it's like for the rest of us! Here we go againBy John Bailey
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 14:11 GMT
Is there anything that ISN'T a threat to American National security? Abusing the dDutch Initiative is a self inflicted wound?By amanfromMars
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 14:31 GMT
"It’s a worry for US authorities who, according to the Times, would see such a deal as a risk to national security by exposing high technology to China." There is an untenable and arrogant presumption in that statement that high technology "belongs" to the US ....which would not be the case if IT were developed in China. With China in a position to spend dollars, the People's Republic would seem to be an ideal location for new higher technologies. I wonder whom one would contact about that. Now where did I put that "Mandarin made Easy" hyperlink? @Eduard ColiBy Chris W
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 14:59 GMT
"No company or government can expect proper treatment of sensitive data by any company that has production in the PRC." Er, you mean unlike airline passenger data, or international money transfer data and a host of other stuff collected by the US government? @ amanfromMarsBy Lee
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 15:01 GMT
That made sense. Taking your medicine again? High technology doesBy Raheim Sherbedgia
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 16:20 GMT
belong to the US. Outside of minor advancements almost all high tech comes from American companies or their contractors. The US owns the Internet and most of the world's telecom and satellite infrastructure as well. In addition they are also the world leaders in the finance tech sector. Many of the tech advances (UK not included) from other countries are actually financed through the U.S. World or Ex-Im banks which underwrite R&D and manufacturing for a stake in the product. For good or ill the U.S. is still the home of technological advancement. The PRC may overtake them one day but right now the PRC is just a big copy maching, replicating the work of the US. @ Chris WBy Eduard Coli
Posted Tuesday 28th August 2007 18:01 GMT
They give that stuff away for free but the PRC wants the US to pay to be ripped off. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Breaking Hardware News
Nvidia issued some somber news for shareholders today, revealing a financial forecast cut short due to slowing sales, a delayed ramp for new product, and a hefty payout due to faulty laptop chips.
Newsletter |