Skip to content

Channel Register

Ebuyer.com runs on a Commodore 64

7 Jul 2007 05:57

Time for an upgrade, boys

SlashdotDiggdel.icio.usReddit
® [Mobile]

« Back to article page

Workhorse 

By David Neil
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 06:08 GMT

They have a Cray and you reckon the Speccy's holding it together?

My money is that the backend is on an HP 3000/48, worked on one of those bad boys back in 96/97 - Thing hadn't had more than 5 mins downtime in 5 years

128k? 

By Nick Ryan
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 06:27 GMT

128k for a spectrum and 3.5Mhz? Not exactly, all the models that were used for hosting were the original 48k models, running at around 1Mhz. The clue is in the "48k" part of the name...

And as for the Commodore Pet, now that was a classic machine!

Cripes. 

By Corrine
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 06:56 GMT

Even my computer is better than these things. Heck, my computer could quite possibly do more than most of those combined.

I am very very impressed with the IT staff there though, I've never heard of Apache running with less than 6 megs of memory (OS included) before.

No wonder... 

By Luca Spiller
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 06:59 GMT

No wonder their search is crap....

Pathetic Search 

By Andrew Gratton
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 07:14 GMT

Rather than spending time doing this frivolous stuff, maybe they can improve their awful search algorithms. Searching for 'Corsair GT' for example finds Corsair OR GT. Also narrowing categories usually is pointless as it just ends up showing all.

Clearly a victim of the floods 

By John Colby
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 07:18 GMT

If you look at the address of this organisation as listed - "Ltd, off Ferry Road, Howden, East Yorkshire, DN14 7UW, United Kingdom" - it is perhaps excusable in that they are probably flooded. I do note that they also have a CBM Pet (the first machine I bought in 1983) and a Cray amongst their fleet.

I say fleet advisedly - as they're now all probably floating.

would not surprise me 

By leslie
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 07:45 GMT

I wonder if they run them on those kebo self igniting UPS units they recalled that then turned up on the carboot sale in rufforth........

If only... 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 07:45 GMT

If only the ebuyer.com website didn't respond like it really *was* run on a Commode 64 this would be more amusing.

Oric Dragon32!? 

By Geoff Mackenzie
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 07:56 GMT

The Dragon32 wasn't manufactured by Oric! Unsurprisingly it was Dragon Data Limited. This one minor discrepancy leads me to suspect that this server information could be slightly inaccurate.

128K rubber keyed Spectrum? 

By Neil Shoreman
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 08:06 GMT

I'm not sure which history books you've been reading but the 1982 rubber keyed ZX Spectrum only had 16K or memory on release with a 48K version following.

The 128K model had a plastic keyboard and was released around the same time as the Commodore 128

But no QL... 

By Adam T
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 09:07 GMT

Did anyone actually own one of these? And has Alan Sugar actually done anything worthwhile since buying Sinclair all those years ago?

Fun spoof though.

Geoff is right about the Dragon 

By Finnbar
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 09:24 GMT

I own two Dragons and an Oric, as well as many other "vintage" machines (yes, I know, I'm a geek), and he's absolutely correct.

The Dragon was manufactured by Dragon Data Limited and the Oric was manufactured by Oric Products International Limited.

(I'm still on the lookout for a Cray. Please quote postage before offering me one...)

Forgettng something? 

By Paul Turvey
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 09:27 GMT

How about the TWO Commodore PETs? These predate the C64 by 2 generations (remember the Vic20?) and had a 6502 running at 1Mhz with a built in monitor and tape drive.

Hmmm memories

128k rubber key spectrum? 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 09:32 GMT

Neil's right. I've got several Spectrums (Spectra?) and there was no 128k rubber key version, unless you made one yourself.

I can only assume that the author was extremely young (if at all extant) when these machines came out, because his lack of knowledge on the subject matter is laughable.

I regret remembering 

By Rob Crawford
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 09:56 GMT

-----

48k models, running at around 1Mhz. The clue is in the "48k" part of the name...

And as for the Commodore Pet, now that was a classic machine!

-----

Fraid not the speccy was always slightly over 3.5MHz (3.513 I seem to remember) even the 16K ones.

Though being a Commodore person you wouldn't believe in clock speeds over 1MHz ;)

Actually I was very fond of the VIC 20 apart from the 20 column display

Spectrum 48k speed 

By OviB
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 10:31 GMT

To Nick Ryan:

48K Spectrums come with 3.5MHz (and 128K also). Back then the CPU frequency was imposed for strict compatibility reasons. There is no Spectrum at a lower frequency than 3.5MHz actually. Trust me because I counted cycles in the machine code over and over again to be sure that the code can finish until the next interrupt arrives :) (interrupts were generated at 20ms each and in some cases you should be absolutely sure that the processing will finish in less than 20ms).

What times - what amazing speeds... :) Anyone doing a lot of stuff in under 20ms nowadays?

Ovi

What about the web server software? 

By Keith Langmead
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 10:40 GMT

Good to see one of their server admins had a sense of humour! :-)

Though if they're going to fake the platform they're running on, why not also fake the server software response as well! Maybe they should report themselves as running an early version of NetSite. Of course maybe they already have faked it, and their servers are actually running IIS!

Nice site 

By Sampler
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 10:51 GMT

I used it to test my webserver - says I'm running Server 2003 - which is highly accurate seeing how it's a fiesty fawn version of Ubuntu Server.

Oh hum - and what's with old tec anyway? We have had a 286 and 386 in daily operation at my company for years now - runs our DOS based call centre software better than the PII's and PIII's that are doing the same job. They never go down, never fail, just keep on running - the old adage is true - they just don't make them like they used to.

Oric was another 8-bit 

By David Jones
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 11:07 GMT

The Oric was another 6502 based home computer, though it looked like a grey Spectrum with flimsy keys and doorstop type case.

I myself started with a VIC-20. Now that was a real computer. If you can't do it in 3.5K then it's not worth doing :p

Pathetic Search...er 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 11:13 GMT

Even before I read the search help page I figured out that 'corsair AND gt' would do the trick. '+corsair +gt' works too. For some reason trying it as a quoted phrase doesn't work.

You, sir, lack search skills.

Stolen! 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 11:15 GMT

i'm going to steal that machine from there suite in the Datacentre.. *grins*

seriously.. I haven't seen there commodore there.. must be hidden away, the eBuyer guys seem to have a sence of humour, faking it ftw.. maybe they will stop copy and pasting from other sites too ;)

Keith 

By Graham Dawson
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 12:01 GMT

"Of course maybe they already have faked it, and their servers are actually running IIS!"

IIS on a spectrum? It'd take nearly 72 hours to boot on one of those old audio tape drives. And then it wouldn't work.

So just like normal really.

Nostalgiatastic 

By James Le Cuirot
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 12:52 GMT

Aah the memories. The first two machines mentioned, the MSX HX-10 and

the C64, happened to be my first two machines. I'm posting this from

my Amiga 1200 for a laugh. See for yourself!

http://www.aura-online.co.uk/~chewi/amireg.gif

Maybe I'll host a site off here sometime. It's got 128MB RAM so it's

more than adequate. (-;

Checked 

By Chrome
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 12:54 GMT

Just went to eBuyer.com with FF2, HeaderSpy and LiveHTTPHeaders

According to these the server software is Apache 2.0.59 running on 'ZX Spectrum 48k (Rubber Keys)'

Awesome

What no Amstrad CPC 464 ? 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 13:38 GMT

Alan Sugar would be mad to be left out. Oh that's right neither he nor I give a shit. I forgot.

Now if eBuyer could just make sure that when I order I actually receive everything that I ordered I might be a happier customer.

big commercial/spam on the register? 

By Jack
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 14:37 GMT

Even the so called geeks who are also commenting on this article before me seem to fall for it.

It's a big publicity stunt. They hacked the apache source files.

Now how much is the register getting for all this or was the article poster that ignorant that he did not see it that it was a hoax?

Any way, the register, please don't lend yourself for this kind of the register abuse. Posting an article what actually is a big commercial is spam. My advise: Don't spam your own readers ;-)

old ?? 

By Dunhill
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 16:02 GMT

If i read all the comments, they sound like that it was only yesterday, but 1 look at the calender suddenly made me feel amazingly old ..

Sinclair available 

By Murray Pearson
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 17:27 GMT

Well, if they're flooded out, I have my dad's Sinclair ZX81 downstairs. That's about a 1MHz Z80 CPU and 1K of RAM built in, but it includes the boffo 64K RAM expander, and a data acquisition and relay control setup. He used them as PLCs for settling tanks at a mine in the Sierra Nevada; he could buy them for $30 in 1983, and even a ZX81 was fast enough to control filling and draining a swimming pool.

Everyone knows 

By peter
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 18:38 GMT

Ebuyer is like dealing with a trade only store but you are Joe Public, simple as.

server farm 

By alan buxey
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 18:47 GMT

hi,

they host their site on a nice server farm - each one responds with a different

server 'identity' - i've just talked to their Dragon 32 , their C64 and their MSX.

its a nice/neat/geeky way of ID'ing each machine in such a setup

SP nice to see the Amiga going strongly in this thread. mine's hardly a classic - 240MHz PowerPC 603e with voodoo3... not what most people recall as Amigas

(those A500 with sensi soccer or monkey Island 2 - aka 12 diskettes of doom)

Power station 

By Peter
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 21:19 GMT

If you could run a power station on a ZX81 then these workhorses should have little trouble runing a mere online shoppe

Title 

By Erik Aamot
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 21:50 GMT

I still have a working 1982 Brown Case Commodore 64 with a 256k memory expansion cartridge , 1541 Floppy Drive ... even came across a color Commodore monitor a few months ago for it, had always run it on a TV before

Lords of Conquest still rocks !

But at 300 BAUD (maybe could rig up 1200 BAUD), I don't think it would make a good internet machine .. I'm kind of attached to my 3Mbits/s DSL

Spectrum 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 22:48 GMT

Hihi

I think you'll find the original spectrum 48K was still 3.5MHz, even the ZX81 came in at a muscular 1.8 or so...

The rubber keyed one was however 48K as you say

And hey Lez, fancy seeing you here -.o

Re: SPAM comment, and the finer points of Orics 

By Geoff Mackenzie
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 23:20 GMT

Calm down, Jack - who's it an advert for? This kind of thing gets posted on The Reg because people think it's funny (like all the others who've commented so far, and countless more who didn't).

And to David Jones: only the Oric 1 looked like a grey doorstopesque Spectrum with flimsy keys; they followed it up with the Atmos, which had a lovely keyboard (not seen the likes of it since, though I do like this Microsoft gull-wing job - and yes, Jack, I'm on commission, heh). The Oric 1 and Atmos were otherwise quite similar internally - at least the later release of the Oric 1 without the nasty ROM bugs. The Atmos got a disk system based around 3" disks like the type used by Amstrad PCWs which made it a real machine - particularly as the controller also supported 5.25" and 3.5" drives. The only thing it really lacked was an 80-column display.

What really killed the Oric was lack of software support. The Spectrum had all the good games, in other words. Game developers didn't like the Oric's serial attribute display, but with only 48K of RAM this was a good move since it gave you colour and (for the time, reasonably) high-res graphics in just a few K of RAM (unlike the BBC B, which had 32K and used 20K for its 80-column mode or higher colour depth graphics modes).

Oric's Stratos and Telestrat (Europe only; a Stratos with a modem) were 'real machines' and could've been actual business micros if things had worked out differently...but ain't that always the way. All of the Orics - even the 1 - kicked seven shades out of the Spec in terms of being nice, finished products. If I remember correctly the Spec didn't even have a Centronics parallel port, which was a hell of a thing to miss out in those days. Also, its motherboard jutted out the back like it had pushed too hard on the can in an ugly edge connector, where the Oric had real ports.

Anyway ... that's more than enough retro geeking out now. I do apologise. (I currently own a BBC B, Acorn Electron and Psion 3, having sold up most of my retro collection a few years ago...bah, I had an HP71B, amongst other Gems... having said that I'm a poor junior software developer so most of my machines probably seem pretty retro to an average person; my all singing all dancing PDA is a Psion 5 and to me that's bleeding edge!)

Standard Security 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Saturday 7th July 2007 23:28 GMT

Someone there has a sense of humour. It is standard when Hardening a Server for security purposes to make it report as a different type of server when queried over the web, someone at ebuyer obviously has a sense of humour.

Web Site not that hard to run... 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 01:21 GMT

Web sites in general are really not that computer extensive in power needs. That is unless you're trying to feed 1,000,000 hits an hour on a single machine. Under mostly DHTML encoding just about any machine could handle this type of traffic need. It ain't rocket science folks!

Coo! 

By Andrew
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 05:16 GMT

Nice to see there are some old-timers contributing to these comments. There's hope for the zimmer frame manufacturers just around the corner.

I was just starting out in the computer industry when the HP9825 and HP9845 were launched in '78. Serious pieces of kit that pre-dated the IBM PC. At home I bought myself a brand spanking Dragon 32 at the local Carrefours, cost me £175 thank you very much. Anyone who hasn't had it tough won't have experience of the 40 character wide display of uppercase alphanumeric only!

Upgraded to an Amstrad 6128 (colour) when that hit the streets. Now despite what people might think of Amstrad, the 6128 was a very nice piece of kit IMHO.

Lighten up Jack! 

By Jamie Jones
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 06:18 GMT

> Even the so called geeks who are also commenting on this article before me

> seem to fall for it.

> It's a big publicity stunt. They hacked the apache source files.

Well, deary, deary me, Jack, I'm sure NONE OF US knew these headers were spoofed.

Sigh, were you the bloke at school who always needed jokes explained to him ?

This is a light and funny article, and the replies.. All the replies are posted along the same vein.

And where's the advert, or the spam ? Um... *answers on a postcard please...*

Gah, yes 

By Nick Ryan
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 06:48 GMT

Gah, yes - was getting confused (but not as confused as the original author)... it was the ZX80 that ran at 1MHz, not the ZX Spectrum. Long, long time ago that I did programming in "machine code" on the Spectrum - about the same time that I did it on the Commodore 64...

As fore requiring hacking of the Apache source, I'm pretty sure that the sever string is just a configuration setting somewhere.

@Murray Pearson - interesting point about using technology like that for industrial purposes - sometimes it's much, much cheaper to use kit like that compared to "industrial" kit that can easily cost 100 times more...

Errors apart ... 

By John Colby
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 08:32 GMT

Errors of detail apart, they are pretty good as jokes.

Just wonder how many server identities are spoofed and how many people have been highlighting the stats as 'proof' of their success in some fields of endeavour. Or how many will now disguise what they actually have.

Hacked the Apache source 

By David Jones
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 09:01 GMT

Well firstly you can do it with mod_headers no need to go near the Apache source.

And secondly, if you were a long time reader of El Reg you would know this is exactly the kind of article they are known for. And that's why we love them :)

We run.... 

By Jason
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 11:01 GMT

6 servers with 600 shops on each, each has 2 X core 2 duo 1.9Ghz, and 4GB RAM.

With 600 shops on that, I don't see how running one shop on that lot should be too hard :)

Cool... 

By J
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 16:51 GMT

Now I want to make my server report that it's running IIS on my Palm VIIx. I know, hardly classic, vintage material. But you've gotta do with what you have... :-)

Cheers

J

Six of one, half a terahertz of the other 

By Kurt Faasse
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 20:28 GMT

There is also a CRAY in the list. Fair and balanced computing?

Seriously, though, are you having a laugh? Or, is it that ebuyer.com is having a laugh by fiddling with the I.D. strings?

What? No Gibson? 

By Turbojerry
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 21:16 GMT

You know, supercomputers they use to like, do physics, and look for oil and stuff?

So not 1eet...

Oracle 

By Gianni Rossi
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 22:14 GMT

I hope these guys can help me out: I need to install Oracle 10g on my Apple II...

Gibson 

By Daniel Ballado-Torres
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 22:32 GMT

Hey! They left out the Gibson!!

Though with Windows being a resource hog and such, I wonder if these computers would run any kind of software faster, as long as it is specifically designed for them ;)

If someone was able to make a web server on a microchip, why not a C-64?

No BBC B - I'm disgusted! 

By Dom
Posted Sunday 8th July 2007 23:50 GMT

Far more robust (once a couple of heatsinks were sorted out) & more expandable than those other 8-bit toys, especially the Torch Z80 2nd processor (added over the 1Mhz bus, IIRC), which would enable relatively easy porting of PC-specific code ..

C64 Executive 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 02:45 GMT

Ha knock them if you will but I sold my C64 "Executive" for almost $1,400 USD on eBay about 18 months ago. Anyone remember those? They were about the size of a modern full size PC case with an incredible 4" (monochrome)monitor that folded out of the front and a REAL floppy drive.

Luxury 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 04:14 GMT

1Mhz ? ... Rubber Keyboard ? ... 1200 baud ? ... East Yorkshire ? ...

You were LUCKY !!

What's The Big Deal? 

By Joe Cassara
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 06:29 GMT

Even if the site did run on an amalgam of those old machines, what's the big deal? You can implement enough of the TCP/IP and a webserver on an 8-bit system to do just that. Have a look at ContikiOS.

How could they miss 

By my crap
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 07:04 GMT

The jupiter ace

Re: Cripes! 

By Greg
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 07:17 GMT

"Even my computer is better than these things. Heck, my computer could quite possibly do more than most of those combined."

I should bloody hope so! :-D

Of course... 

By Mike Bennett
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 07:51 GMT

Of course there's no Gibson, don't you know how easy it is to hack the Gibson?

I'm sorry, I couldn't resist.

I am reminded 

By Simon Greenwood
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 08:59 GMT

That back in the day Easynet's core routers were called things like Centipede and Galaxian, which made traceroutes slightly more interesting.

It brought tears in my eyes... 

By Daniel S.
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 09:29 GMT

... someone correcting the article on exact (PAL) clock frequency of ZX Spectrum, A500 and Sensible Socker (Kick Off was better, I think), C64 and one cycle per instruction (kind of) processor (which is slightly faster then beloved Spectrum's 4 cycles at least), writing on border by changing background colour and TCP/IP stack for Amiga...

Gosh, it all reminds me how old I am!

Now I see 

By mad clarinet
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 09:50 GMT

I've worked out why their site can be such a pain at times then.

I'd have used a reliable BBC Model A or B - maybe upgrade it to a BBC Master (maybe even add the 65C02 co-processor)...........

They encourage me... 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 10:14 GMT

...to host my own website on my cell phone, since it is some 20 times more powerful than all those machines combined, at least.

Too bad it will a bit exposed to viruses, worms and such, since it has enough memory to load and run a virus code. These vintages probably can't even load viruses in their tiny memory, which kinda explains why they keep up and running since 1983.

Nice hoax, though. I bet, in fact, there are some chunky clusters behind the fake names. It is something like labeling 'salt' on the sugar container so the ants won't find it.

Server Masking 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 10:35 GMT

Nothing special about this it doesn't even deserve a news peice to be fair. Its a simple case of some little 12yr old utilising the masking capability of Mod Security or some such add-in for Apache.

Get a life you sad gits and stop with the shameless self-PR.

Forgotten? Not by me.. 

By Sir Runcible Spoon
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 11:36 GMT

Will no-one spare a thought for the Atari-800, I may have been a cmd fanboy in my youf, but that atari had some wonderful graphics...ahhh.

Was I the only one to get... 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 11:39 GMT

...a TI99/4A back in 1979 when Uncle Clive couldn't deliver a Speccy in time for christmas... Sadly, it turned up a few days before christmas and had to go back. Still, I learned to do more than LOAD "", and Parsec was class :)

All work and no play... 

By Nick Ryan
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 12:14 GMT

"Nothing special about this it doesn't even deserve a news peice to be fair. Its a simple case of some little 12yr old utilising the masking capability of Mod Security or some such add-in for Apache.

Get a life you sad gits and stop with the shameless self-PR."

All work and no play makes for a very miserable individual. If you can't at least *try* and have some fun in IT occasionally, you might as well crawl back into a darkened room and order some more pizza. Mmmmm... pizza....

Obviously as this thread is read by folks that were around in computing the same time as me... does anybody remember the computer that was touted as "being the worst ever"? Was it the Oric Atmos, or something like that - I vaguely remember it being an attempted ZX Spectrum knock off that was built and designed so badly that it started occasionally and when it did it just crashed for no reason at all. Some things never change... :0

We seem to have missed out the Commodore +4, Commodore 128, Amstrad CPC, Spectrum+ (or whatever it was called, after sinclair sold it)... the others seem to have been mentioned. Would including such delights as the Sharp computers count as well?

As for the C64 "Executive" - glad I'm not the only one to remember that "luggable" piece of kit - portable is just the wrong kind of description!

Duh 

By Adrian Inman
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 12:42 GMT

They're using an ISAPI plugin to put off would be hackers. Lame trick as a proper vulnerability scanner will see past this advertisement.

Tools here: http://www.port80software.com/support/articles/maskyourwebserver

Was mentioned on a Security course I was on a while back.

Not all toys 

By John Freck
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 12:54 GMT

Please note there's a Cray in there - probably just front ending the important stuff

Nintendo uses its own hardware 

By David Cole
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 13:18 GMT

Check it out:

http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=nintendo.com

Nintendo uses GameCubes!

out headers... 

By Simon Painter
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 15:33 GMT

Our pen testing suggested we do something similar. I am toying with making our IIS servers report as apache 1.0 on an apple ipod (see ipodlinux.org for feasability).

If it has a chip in it then someone will try to boot Linux on it so maybe my headers should read: Apache 1.0 running on a Cod Supper.

Web Pservers 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 16:29 GMT

There were actually two web servers available for the Psion 5 (and other EPOC devices), one of which was written in Perl, so presumably it would be possible to run a site like that using Perl or Python based CGI for all the backend stuff for real. The bottleneck would be the Serial link only going up to 115K baud, so it would be a bit slow for broadband users.

Re: Nintendo uses its own hardware 

By James Penketh
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 16:50 GMT

OMG! They're running Solaris8 on a Gamecube.

T3H L337!!!!!!111one!11eleventyone!

Hmmm... I wonder if I can run *nix on my Amstrad PPC640?

640KB RAM, 16bit 8088 CPU (Yeah, I know I'm lucky.), crappy 9inch LCD monitor.

Now that was one helluva brick^w laptop.

My first computer was an Amstrad 464plus, 8bit glory... in a 16bit world.

PPC640 (16-bit) made ~1987. 464plus (8-bit) made 1990.

I wish it still worked... *sniff*

Cray speed 

By Nano nano
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 16:57 GMT

In case some of you were thinking that the Cray might make up for the relative lack of MIPS of the other hosting machines, although the Cray series was good at doing vector floating point multiplies, I doubt whether its pipelines and functional units would give much of a boost to running Apache, though maybe its peripheral processors could serve web pages independently.

Ah those days back in .... 

By Roland Korn
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 17:36 GMT

High-School. They had a WANG 2200 and I was at home banging on a Apple IIc soon to be follwed by a salvaged Apple III and then a Mac Portable .... monochrome LCD but the battery life dropped to only 6 hours with the backlighting on.

Ran my BBS of a Apple IIgs with a LAVA drive card and a DEC cable to string together a number of 20 meg drives. This was long after running the BBS off a Apple III with its single hard drive, dual floppies and that disk pack thingy that switched 5 1/4" floppies for you.

God I'm old 

By david mccormick
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 17:51 GMT

" I vaguely remember it being an attempted ZX Spectrum knock off that was built and designed so badly that it started occasionally and when it did it just crashed for no reason at all. "

No Nick your remembering the speccy. I had the 48k rubber key and after spending 5 minutes at a time loading ghouls and goblins a level at a time it always crashed a level from the end forcing me to start again.

Pointless 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th July 2007 18:31 GMT

Even masking the server isn't enough to stop a hacker. TCP Fingerprinting would give you the "actual" OS right off the belt... Totally pointless kids playing with new toys! and at the same time trying for self-PR.

Ebuyer are indeed the sux. :-)

They missed the best... 

By Ian Large
Posted Wednesday 11th July 2007 18:15 GMT

My old TRS-80 Model I made everything else on the consumer market at the time look sick. 16K RAM as standard and if you got the expansion box you got 48K and could drive up to two cassettes and eight floppies. Home of my earliest experiments with Z80 assembler...

I am not a geek 

By David Allan
Posted Wednesday 11th July 2007 23:48 GMT

ahh, I still have a Commodore 64 with a tape drive, could plug into a decent sized television in it's day, *sigh* ah the nostalgia.

Someone once asked me if it's possible to get internet on a C64... to this day I'm still not sure.

@Andrew 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Friday 13th July 2007 12:14 GMT

"Anyone who hasn't had it tough won't have experience of the 40 character wide display of uppercase alphanumeric only!"

There was a rather nice piece of software you could get for the Dragon that gave you full screen display, mixed case with a few fonts and controllable sprite graphics. All ran in 2k, so left you enough RAM to write something usable with the features. Unfortunately, I can't for the life of me remember what it was called, although I think that the company that wrote/sold it may have been called Oasis????

I could never understand why Dragon Data didn't buy the boys who wrote this out and ship it in ROM. They'd have had a world-beater on their hands.

Still got the Dragon. Unfortunately, the box that I put all the manuals, tapes etc. in appears to have gone missing sometime in the distant past.

TeeCee

Nice one 

By Bert Ragnarok
Posted Saturday 21st July 2007 08:52 GMT

Of course they're spoofing. They're actually running PDP-11s. (Sigh)

Related Whitepapers