The Channel logo

Politics hurting web services - Gartner

  • alert
  • print

These standards 'ain't what they used to be

Vendor politics are clouding development of web services specifications and causing confusion and adding unnecessary complexity.

That's according to Gartner, which has added its voice to a growing chorus of concern that the industry is moving away from simplified interoperability between different platforms - which was one of the original visions for web services.

David Mitchell Smith, a Gartner fello,w said vendors could differentiate themselves by taking a step back from the hype, and offering a simple approach to the web services that they advance through the standards process and support in their products.

Instead, vendors view standards as part of their competitive advantage. "The standards process is very political and there's a lot of perception of leadership", he said, with the leadership role based on who can define standards, who participates in the standards process, and who implements standards.

Smith singled out the "WS splat", an ever-expanding tangle developed - invariably - by IBM, Microsoft and their various allies in one camp and Sun, Oracle and their own supporters in the rival camp.

Examples include Web Services Reliability and WS-ReliableMessaging: the former is already with the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) and the latter is headed that way.

The World Wide Web Consortium's (W3C's) Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 2.0 is another bone of contention. WSDL 2.0 twice references WS-Addressing, another specification developed by IBM, Microsoft, BEA Systems and SAP.

WS-Addressing was conceived by the vendors to provide reliable transfer of messages between multiple end points while WSDL describes network end-points using XML. WS-Addressing was submitted to the W3C just over a year ago.

"That completely violates one of the principles web services people have had from day one - to keep it simple and modular. That's a giant red flag to say things are not working," Smith said of the WSDL 2.0 and WS-Addressing combination.

W3C architecture Domain Leader Philippe LeHegaret, responding separately, said WS-Addressing is not required to implement WSDL 2.0 and WS-Addressing is not required to support WSDL 2.0. LeHegaret said it made sense for WSDL to point to WS-Addressing because WS-Addressing is a "fundamental piece" of the web services architecture.

Smith made his comments yesterday at Gartner's Symposium and IT/xpo 2005. ®

Related stories

OASIS to define SOA
OASIS open standards not open enough
XML Tower of Babel - bring on UBL
IBM throws weight behind BPEL
WS Reliable Messaging creeps forward

45689Politics hurting web services - GartnerPolitics hurting web services - GartnerPolitics%20hurting%20web%20services%20-%20GartnerThese standards 'ain't what they used to be_gartner_web_services_standardsnews'news'Gartner web services standards WSDL WS-Addressing WS- W3C/2005/05/18/_gartner_web_services_standards/channelregister.co.uknewsNews11116399579WednesdayWed200505MayMay181818th0659392005-05-18T06:59:39Z11116399180WednesdayWed200505MayMay181818th0653002005-05-18T06:53:00Z45688IBM: we have simplified our softwareIBM: we have simplified our softwareIBM%3A%20we%20have%20simplified%20our%20softwareApparentlyibm_gartner_millsnews'news'Gartner IBM Steve Mills WebSphere/2005/05/18/ibm_gartner_mills/channelregister.co.uknewsNews11116398800WednesdayWed200505MayMay181818th0646402005-05-18T06:46:40Z11116398781WednesdayWed200505MayMay181818th0646212005-05-18T06:46:21Z45692Microsoft sued over ExcelMicrosoft sued over ExcelMicrosoft%20sued%20over%20ExcelGuatemalan inventor claims $500mmicrosoft_court_excelnews'news'microsoft excel access/2005/05/18/microsoft_court_excel/channelregister.co.uknewsNews11116410141WednesdayWed200505MayMay181818th0955412005-05-18T09:55:41Z11116419349WednesdayWed200505MayMay181818th1229092005-05-18T12:29:09Zmicrosoft10024Gavin Clarkegavin.clarke@theregister.co.ukGavin Clarke in San Francisco894Gavin Clarke/2013/03/25/gavin198.png'Gavin Clarke'Gavin%20Clarkehttp://reg.cx/1naH00Vendor politics are clouding development of web services specifications and causing confusion and adding unnecessary complexity. That's according to Gartner, which has added its voice to a growing chorus of concern that the industry is moving away from simplified interoperability between different platforms - which was one of the original visions for web services. David Mitchell Smith, a Gartner fello,w said vendors could differentiate themselves by taking a step back from the hype, and offering a simple approach to the web services that they advance through the standards process and support in their products. Instead, vendors view standards as part of their competitive advantage. "The standards process is very political and there's a lot of perception of leadership", he said, with the leadership role based on who can define standards, who participates in the standards process, and who implements standards. Smith singled out the "WS splat", an ever-expanding tangle developed - invariably - by IBM, Microsoft and their various allies in one camp and Sun, Oracle and their own supporters in the rival camp. Examples include Web Services Reliability and WS-ReliableMessaging: the former is already with the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) and the latter is headed that way. The World Wide Web Consortium's (W3C's) Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 2.0 is another bone of contention. WSDL 2.0 twice references WS-Addressing, another specification developed by IBM, Microsoft, BEA Systems and SAP. WS-Addressing was conceived by the vendors to provide reliable transfer of messages between multiple end points while WSDL describes network end-points using XML. WS-Addressing was submitted to the W3C just over a year ago. "That completely violates one of the principles web services people have had from day one - to keep it simple and modular. That's a giant red flag to say things are not working," Smith said of the WSDL 2.0 and WS-Addressing combination. W3C architecture Domain Leader Philippe LeHegaret, responding separately, said WS-Addressing is not required to implement WSDL 2.0 and WS-Addressing is not required to support WSDL 2.0. LeHegaret said it made sense for WSDL to point to WS-Addressing because WS-Addressing is a "fundamental piece" of the web services architecture. Smith made his comments yesterday at Gartner's Symposium and IT/xpo 2005. ® Related stories OASIS to define SOA OASIS open standards not open enough XML Tower of Babel - bring on UBL IBM throws weight behind BPEL WS Reliable Messaging creeps forward

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.