The Channel logo


By | Tony Smith 23rd December 2004 10:00

WTO backs Hynix over US DRAM duties

But low-priced imports did hurt US memory makers

The World Trade Organisation (WTO) has said that the US should not have imposed import duties on South Korean memory maker Hynix.

However, early indications suggest the US may be preparing to appeal against the judgement.

The WTO's decision follows the US inability to prove that the South Korean government had provided Hynix with aid outlawed by the trade body. The organisation's investigation was spurred by a complaint made by South Korea after the US imposed the 44.7 per cent import duty in the summer of 2003, itself the result of a local probe made at the behest of US-based memory maker Micron.

Hynix has always maintained that the rescue financing it received in 2001 did not amount to state aid, even though at the time the South Korean government held stakes in some of its creditor banks. Since then South Korea has moved to reduce its level of ownership of these institutions. More to the point, said Hynix, funding also came from foreign banks.

The WTO judgement did not go entirely Hynix's way, however. The organisation said that imports of lower-priced memory chips from South Korea had harmed US producers.

That ruling will allow the US to maintain import duties on Hynix DRAM, but at a reduced rate in punishment solely for that harm done to domestic DRAM makers and not for receiving state aid.

The full text of the WTO trade panel's decision has yet to be published, though its broad thrust was made public in a preliminary ruling sent recently to both the US and South Korean governments.

If the US does appeal against the WTO's decision, as officials cited by a number of reports this morning suggest it will, then it will likely focus on "misleading" and "exaggerated" claims made by South Korea, one official said, according to an Economic Times report.

Should the appeal also fail, the US will have the opportunity to present further evidence to back its claim. But the US appears confident that, one way or another, the duty will remain in force.

"To presume that these tariffs at the end of the day will be removed, I think, is a significant overstatement," the official said.

Meanwhile, the WTO continues to ponder South Korea's complaint against the European Union over a similar import duty imposed last year on Hynix memory products. Like the US levy, the EU tariff arose - amounting to 34.8 per cent - after Hynix was found guilty of receiving illegal state aid. Once again, that ruling came after a local memory maker - this time Infineon - had grumbled about Hynix's rescue funding.

The WTO is expected to issue a preliminary report on the EU duty in March 2005. ®

Related stories

Japan to probe Hynix DRAM dealings
Elpida, Micron ask Japan to take Hynix to task
WTO to rule on Hynix import duties
Hynix appeals against EU DRAM tax
South Korea asks WTO to overturn EU Hynix levy
Elpida, Nanya demand Hynix DRAM probes
Hynix loses US 45% DRAM tax appeal
South Korea appeals to WTO over Hynix DRAM tariffs
Micron demands WTO declare Hynix rescue actionable
Hynix bail-out plan sets Micron a-grumbling

alert Send corrections


Privacy image

Frank Jennings

Two working parties, ministers galore... but data transfer law remains in limbo

Chris Evans

It does simplify the hardware setup, whatever it is
A microscopic view of the biometric shark skin. Pic: James Weaver

Chris Mellor

Do something and stop faffing about in the bush league

Kat Hall

International system in general needs greater transparency


Nerd fail photo via Shutterstock
Shouting match
Single market vs. rest of the world
Mostly it's financial crime. Here's what all the cool kids' terms mean in English
Apple logo. Pic: Blake Patterson
Plenty of bumps in the 40-year road for Mac makers